Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patrick Gerard's avatar

Updated with some direct links to Dr. Fabletonic covers of Grant and his bands:

https://youtu.be/Ohgp8ioEZR8?is=_cmiK4_Giwt0dq5I

Patrick Gerard's avatar

Grant -

Stray thoughts.

I sent you and Kristan a cover of John Lennon Like You, fully produced. I have interesting covers of Never Find Time and Tortured Soul but I was sending you too much. I sort of push my ideas through a Lennon-McCartney mold with my lyrics assistant (it mainly keeps me from doing anything they wouldn't and nudges where they would). I had it assess your music and John Lennon Like You rates as 97% Lennon authored by vocabulary whereas Never Find Time gets a solid B- and a caveat that it recognizes they weren't necessarily meant to be tested.

To be clear, in my system, a true Lennon track of any pedigree would have trouble getting 100% because it would be trope to the point of parody whereas certain types of songs would be expected to hit between 95% and 100%. Literally every structural "teacher's note" was confined to the back half, which I don't think is channeling Lennon fully anymore.

As for comics evolving and art, I tend towards the idea that the evolving art is why the last 30 years have been a writer's era. It's kept many writers fresh to see them in different coats of paint and the strongest evolutions in evolving veteran writers like Mark have involved the writer learning tricks from artists. I'm not a believer in Marvel Method but I think it's instructive in a way if the writer actually collaborates with the artists. Aside from your most trusted collaborators developing a rapport, I think there's something of you capturing an artist's essence in things like Multiversity. No disrespect to Lee but he was for example the perfect mark for Earth X because of his penchant for dog collars, leather, and flawless idealized bodies, a dramatized visual romanticism that is Wagnerian. Whereas Superman's speech about jet-powered apes in JLA Classified was perfect for Ed McGuinness' C.C. Beck by way of Japanese anime and fighting games Superman! You write to the artist, the artist evolves. It is -- and I say this with affection -- the shape of Jeph Loeb's career. His vibrant triumphs are a dialogue with artists, his oversteps are in tandem with artists, the loss of Tim Sale was like losing a conjoined other half, his market perception as an elder statesman is as much because he isn't working with Dan Mora and Waid has been.

The artists evolving has showcased the writers as Texas Rodeo champion riders. Scott Snyder is all about leaning into an aesthetic to avoid getting dismounted.

As for good and evil, as a young man, I tried rejecting that evil existed. The aftermath of 9/11 challenged that for me and what broke was when my college roommate was murdered. I'm not painting these as pure external forces. I think I discovered evil in me, something I think we all have. But I think BECOMING evil has a prerequisite: it can only happen to someone moralistic in the first place.

There is only pleasure in breaching a boundary one knows exists. The most evil people in the world were often slapped and bullied into recognizing morality. I'm not suggesting they're victims of a bad childhood. They choose to breach. But they breach the boundaries that they're aware of.

A person who isn't moralistic can be dangerous, harmful, or just generally shitty and counterproductive. I'm not preaching amorality. But evil requires seeing lines clearly to cross and the limits of evil's often weak imagination is that it only sees the lines it knows and cannot cross all the other lines that people do, knowingly or unknowingly.

I desperately think the world doesn't need more evil Supermen. Superman is a subversive idea already. A subversion of a subversion tends to be Dog Bites Man (or Man Provokes Dog to Bite Man). It doesn't have the breach required to form narrative.

That said, the trick they're all missing is that the scary thing about an evil Superman is that he's so deeply moral and moral as shaped by an understanding of nature with his X-Ray eyes that the moralism itself means an evil Superman should terrify in a way seldom realized.

An evil Superman ought to know as plain as a regular Superman the Maggin adage that "There is a right and wrong in the universe and the distinction is not a difficult one to make". By definition, an evil Superman (or Zod or Eradicator or Cyborg Superman or Satan Girl) has experienced the epiphany that reformed Luthor in All-Star and chosen smallness, pettiness, or sadism.

Evil Supermen tend to be portrayed as small minds. Imagine if the Composite Superman were NOT a small mind. He'd outmaneuver us all with 12th level intellect and quantum perception and time travel and ability to triplicate himself! Injustice Superman or the others we tend to encounter (including Waid's) are myopic. IF you imagined a Superman who had the cosmic epiphany and chose to subjugate us, it might even suggest to some that we deserved it and defeating him would be pointless. And at a minimum, his absolute knowledge of justice and choice to reject it would make him more than a flailing man in grief but existentially terrifying!

It's akin to saying, "God is real and He created the universe and you specifically so that you could die."

It's a profound inversion of miracle if taken seriously.

31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?